EXTREME HERMENEUTICS OF THOMAS’ GOSPEL
Keywords:
Gospel of Thomas, Gnosticism, Early Christianity, hermeneuticsAbstract
The main thesis of this article is that an appropriate interpretation of the Gospel of Thomas, one of the most important and most enigmatic non-canonical documents of Early Christianity, has not been thoroughly carried out without accepting a unique hermeneutical challenge of its pseudonymous author directed to his readers and followers. A true response to this interpretative challenge is a unique „extreme hermeneutics”, because in the incipit of the Gospel of Thomas, its appropriate interpretation has been announced as the matter of life and death. Therefore, a sort of verbal „distortion”, a meta-linguistic transformation or commitment to paradox appears as a mysterious key to revelation, i.e. as a way to reveal a great mystery deeply embedded in the structure of reality manifested by the ‘Living Jesus’. Like the Buddhist (Rinzai) Zen masters, who applied the koans in their practice, Thomas’ Jesus did something with his words. His profound, paradoxical proclamations perform a distinct performative-soteriological function, an effect partly produced by canonical gospels through their meta-linguistic techniques, such as miracles or ‘signs’. Finally, the author has pointed out the parallels with some other philosophical and religious teachings (Zen Buddhism, Advaita Vedanta, etc.) in which the Thomasine experience of awakening, i.e. the insight into the true character of a unique and indivisible nature of ultimate reality, has also been emphasized.
References
Balyani, A. (2011). Know Yourself: An Explanation of the Oneness of Being. Transl. Cecilia Twinch. Beshara Publications.
Bauer, W. (1979). Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity. Fortress Press.
Broek, R. (2013). Gnostic Religion in Antiquity. Cambridge U.P.
De Conick, A. (1996). Seek to See Him: Ascent and Vision Mysticism in the Gospel of Thomas. Leiden. Brill.
Denzey-Lewis, N. (2014). A New Gnosticism: Why Simon Gathercole and Mark Goodacre on the Gospel of Thomas Change the Field. JNTS, vol. 36, no. 3 (2014): 240–250.
Dillon, M. J. (2016). Gnosticism Theorized: Major Trends and Approaches to the Study of Gnosticism. In DeConick, A. Religion: Secret Religion. MacMillan.
Goodacre, M. (2012). Thomas and the Gospels. Eerdmans.
Gathercole, S. (2012). The Composition of the Gospel of Thomas. Cambridge U.P.
Jevanđelje po Tomi (1992). Gnostički tekstovi. Alef. Gradac.
Jonas, H. (1993). Gnosis und spätantiker Geist vol. 2:1–2. Göttingen. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
King, K. (2005). What is Gnosticism? Harvard University Press.
Korzybski, A. (1995). Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. Institute of General Semantics. New York.
Kur’an s prevodom (1412 h.). Prev. B. Korkut, Medina.
Labib, Pahor, ed. (1956). Coptic Gnostic Papyri in the Coptic Museum at Old Cairo. (Vol. 1, plates 80–99). Cairo: Government Press.
Patterson S. et al. (2011). The Fifth Gospel. London. T&T Clark.
Rudolph, K. (1987). Gnosis: The Nature & Structure of Gnosticism. Harper & Row.
The Upanishads (1979). Transl. by Juan Mascaro. Penguin Classics.
Uro, R. (2003). Thomas: Seeking the Historical Context of the Gospel of Thomas. London. T&T Clark.
Vukomanović, Milan (2007). Svet Tominog jevanđelja. Beograd. Čigoja štampa.
Vukomanović, Milan (1993). An Inquiry into the Origin and Transmission of the Gospel of Thomas. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Williams, M. (1996). Rethinking Gnosticism: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. Princeton U. P.

ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
CEEOL - Central and Eastern European Online Library
The DOI Foundation